Monthly Archives: January 2016
Self-Seeking in Our Resentment
Resent Your Spouse? Write Inventory!
The first set of instructions is to make a list of…” – Anybody Can Take Steps, Chp. 4
Why so Stubborn about a 2nd Step?
Obey Your Conscience
Why Force Your Will?
The Deliberate vs Random Obsession
Follow Up to Hari – Moral Aspect & Stigma Bullshit
The Moral Aspect
The problem with making assumptions or drawing conclusions by simply observing something is that you have still have no actual experience of what you’re observing, so here is the truth instead. And the truth is important when we talk about addiction, given how lethal it is for us and how gut-wrenching it is for those who love us.
There are many false assumptions about the moral aspect of addiction, and in fact, if you wanna bitch about stigmatizing things, then stop stigmatizing morality as well. The blind, kumbaya-humming crowd believe addiction is not a moral failure because addicts cannot control their drinking and using. First of all, how do you think they lost control to begin with? To go from a normal sober person to an addict with no control, I’m pretty sure you gotta use a few times first.
When I first smoked weed or first ate an OxyContin or first cut up a line of heroin and sniffed it up, I KNEW IT WAS THE WRONG THING TO DO. Everybody knows that. Everybody knows it’s wrong to use drugs. Let’s get our heads out of the sand, shall we? Of course, now you have people saying that morality is relative and doesn’t (shouldn’t) exist. Wait a second, let’s back up. How do we know if something is wrong? Because it hurts self and others. Settled.
So if using drugs hurts self and others and the person hasn’t lost control yet, it is clearly wrong to be using drugs. And guess what? It’s still wrong after we lose control, as we have simply lost control of doing the wrong thing. Get it? It still hurts others regardless of whether we have control or not. Losing control doesn’t suddenly change something that is wrong to something that is not wrong. Plus, the act of using enough drugs to go from ‘in control’ to ‘out of control’ is a voluntary act. Losing control is the result of multiple wrong acts. That is a moral failure. Case closed.
But then you also have this assertion that plenty of people lose control from some painkiller they were prescribed and are therefore not engaging in any such moral failure, nor are they exhibiting any such character flaws (Oh get thee back you evil term ‘character defect’ – so evil and stigmatizing!). Sure, any non-addict taking pills AS PRESCRIBED for legitimate pain is not committing a wrong. However, everything changes as soon as either a) we start taking more than the prescribed dose, b) we continue eating the pills long after the pain is gone, or c) we lose control over the course of our regimen and then continue getting high by getting more pills, buying drugs elsewhere, or changing drugs.
(By the way, this ‘allergy’ we speak of crosses ALL lines, by the way. Alcoholic = addict. It’s just one allergy to any and all mood-altering substances, so those AA guys who tell addicts or potheads to get out of AA are imbeciles. They are actively preventing people from getting better).
To continue with the previous situation, it is also wrong if we are aware of a pre-existing drug problem (i.e. we know we are addicts) and allow the doctor to prescribe us a bottle of painkillers because we had a single wisdom tooth pulled. That is dishonest and we are actively doing the wrong thing because we know that once we start, we have no control. Plus we are wimps. Pain is good for addicts. The more pain and the more humility, the better. Same for narcissists, sociopaths, and, yes, people wallowing in depression. I know that will appall some readers but all three do share many of the same criteria – lack of feeling, lack of empathy, disturbed relationships, edginess, image problems, self-hatred, pathological focus on self…
At any rate, sure it isn’t wrong to inadvertently or cluelessly become dependent while simply taking prescribed painkillers ‘as prescribed’, but again, once we lose control we no longer have the right to continue using. No matter how you slice it, using drugs is wrong and it is most certainly a moral failure – whether you still have control or not. Losing power doesn’t suddenly change the act of using from wrong to not wrong. Why? Because the effect is still very much the same: Harm to self and those who love us. Furthermore, we also maintain the responsibility to regain our power, once lost.
By the way, I am re-printing The Privileged Addict so it reads easier. The line and paragraph spacing is closer, as well as a few other minor changes, so that should help some readers who were annoyed at the original layout.
Comments/Responses from original Hari post:
Comment:
Totally agree. Tons of people have asserted this for years and years and years, so it is nothing novel as he implies. More importantly, it has very little or nothing at all to do with addiction, whether fueling, maintaining, preventing or removing it. Thanks so much for reading.
I remember a while ago some clinician posted a comment that what I was doing was extremely destructive. Lol. The piece he couldn’t stand was about the failure of various conventional treatment methods, such as trigger identification / relapse prevention and so forth. He said that writing down (invented) triggers (and then trying to avoid them) “works for most people”.
The "Experts" Have It Backwards
Year ago, I had a sponsee who I used to rip into with great consistency, as someone lovingly did for me years before that. Yes, lovingly. He and many other guys I used to rip apart knew that I loved them, that they could trust me, and that I wasn’t delivering judgment as we think of it – in some asshole tone of voice and/or while choking them in a headlock. They respected me because they finally met someone who could see through the miles of bullshit (which could have been any recovered addict), and who was willing to be honest with them about it.
Personally, I don’t need or want any of that shit. I only wanted it when I was very ill, when I wanted to get jammed and live for habitual comfort. You see, we’re not nearly as pathetic and disabled and diseased as we have led you to believe, and now everybody, including the medical establishment, has taken the bait and defined us as permanently incapable, when the truth is that addicts who don’t get better simply don’t want to get better.
The sad truth is that addicts refuse to lift a finger to even support their own habits. Nowadays, they are almost annoyed when they don’t get free stuff. They feel completely entitled to free methadone, free food, free rent, free everything. The dependency state has spilled over into addiction, as we now approve services for potheads who like to steal mommy’s Percocets when they feel a little depressed after running out of pot. By the way, how do people think this stuff paid for? Trust me, you would fall right out right out of your chair while barfing uncontrollably like the girl in the Exorcist if you knew where your taxes were going.
More Disease Model Delusions
Unfortunately, the physiology of addiction doesn’t account for, well, everything else. While this will continue to be a bummer for those looking for an easy way out, it will come as great news to the pharmaceutical model – i.e. massive profits.
According to Wikipedia, the disease model of addiction “describes an addiction as a disease with biological, neurological, genetic, and environmental sources of origin.” Lol, um, behavioral? Did I miss something? So wait, genes and environment come before, say, loving to drink and use and then continuing to drink and use like an absolute pig until you break your f’ing body and mutate yourself into a junkbox? Sorry to be a dick, but what sort of message does that send? You have now removed any incentive, urgency or necessity for the addict to engage in hard work, right action and personal change. You have also blinded them from the knowledge that he or she must have the power of God come to them and restore them to sanity. There is no hope for any serious addict who isn’t all lit up with Spirit, who hasn’t become God-conscious.
But hey, don’t worry because now your addict can rest easy, knowing that he was afflicted from birth with an involuntary disease and that he can do nothing to stop his drinking, using, lying, stealing and calling you a fucking bitch. He will be relapsing (not to mention whining about his injustice) unimpeded and guilt-free, all through life… so fuck you mom, fuck you dad, fuck you everybody. Great stuff. Oh, and according to all of the experts (and many others like the dude from the TED Talk), it’s also environmental, so if you were a good parent, think twice. Yup, that’s right. There are plenty of whackjobs out there who will have you believe that you suck, that you must have fucked them up somehow. Well, listen up, that is all BULLSHIT. We make ourselves addicts and we owe you everything in this world. Never blame yourself or your genes for our addiction. Never. ALL external reasons are 100% FALSE.
Sorry, but the masses are being lied to (and not just about addiction but a host of other major issues currently facing us today). But if they are going to call addiction a disease and give addicts a label by which we can handily excuse our atrocious behavior, they could at least tell the truth.
If you want to call addiction a disease, than you must be sure to separate it from other diseases beyond one’s control, such as juvenile leukemia etc. Addiction is a disease that we give to ourselves, and it is also a disease that we can choose to keep in remission should we work to remove the mental obsession and find the guts to walk through some pain, face adult life and obey our conscience. Once an addict reacquires the power of choice, relapsing is very much a choice, obviously. At that point, relapse is nothing more than a personal and moral failure. Sorry, but that’s a fact. And no, I am no shining example of anything. If it sounds like I’m “preaching from a spiritual hilltop” as some troll posted last week, well, not to worry. I’m a piece of shit, too. And while I try to engage in service when I can, I often find myself not really caring or feeling too much for others. Who knows, maybe we’ll always just be fucked on some level.
At any rate, the disease aspect begins and ends with the simple physical problem of using abnormally – that we physically respond to drugs and alcohol differently than others. It simply means we experience the phenomenon of craving once we start drinking or using.
My fellow addicts our there can call me a dick. I don’t care. Why would I? We are really just comfort-obsessed children who demand that our very special, unique and important feelings and needs and sensitivities MUST BE MET. It’s always the addicts who get prickly, though I’ve had a couple of anonymous parents lose it on me as well, even though I have nothing to do with anybody’s pain.
But hey, to the addicts who troll me and whine about shit, 1) It’s not about you, it’s about the people in our lives. Get over it! 2) I would be happy to stop doing this if the hundreds and hundreds of people who have emailed me to thank me profusely would also stop, and 3) At least I’m trying, what are YOU doing? Anything???
